You show how money and power have changed roles, using examples from Rome, scripture, and other historical events. The use of chiasmus makes the argument clear and avoids slogans. Changing from “follow the money” to “follow the servility” helps explain this shift in thinking. The last question about freedom encourages readers to make a conscious choice rather than simply seek comfort. - Thanks for pulling together... a lot!
William, thank you! I'm glad my last turn here was clear enough, encouraging "readers to make a conscious choice rather than simply seek comfort." I often think about Simeon in the temple. After blessing Mary and Joseph, Simeon says to Mary, "and you too will be pierced to the heart." Some comfort!
Bryce, a wonderful review, from Rome to SCOTUS to Elon.
I think there is a bit too much love for the concept of chiasmus, however. The callow caudillo understands power is maintained with violence — against bodies, against language — but also as a means to money. The orange family has reportedly made over $1b in a year in power. Centering on chiasmus in this contest feels a bit like chicken or the egg. Rich b/c of power or powerful b/c rich? In these days of the Epstein Class, I think the answer is simply, Yes.
You show how money and power have changed roles, using examples from Rome, scripture, and other historical events. The use of chiasmus makes the argument clear and avoids slogans. Changing from “follow the money” to “follow the servility” helps explain this shift in thinking. The last question about freedom encourages readers to make a conscious choice rather than simply seek comfort. - Thanks for pulling together... a lot!
William, thank you! I'm glad my last turn here was clear enough, encouraging "readers to make a conscious choice rather than simply seek comfort." I often think about Simeon in the temple. After blessing Mary and Joseph, Simeon says to Mary, "and you too will be pierced to the heart." Some comfort!
Wonder-ful !
Bryce, a wonderful review, from Rome to SCOTUS to Elon.
I think there is a bit too much love for the concept of chiasmus, however. The callow caudillo understands power is maintained with violence — against bodies, against language — but also as a means to money. The orange family has reportedly made over $1b in a year in power. Centering on chiasmus in this contest feels a bit like chicken or the egg. Rich b/c of power or powerful b/c rich? In these days of the Epstein Class, I think the answer is simply, Yes.